Contents

NOTE: All of the information and data on this page is preliminary. Our intent is to keep the users informed about the Red Channel upgrade so that they can make decisions and rough estimates for use in proposals beginning with the first trimester of 2007. More precise information will be provided following the camera optimization during the upgrade.


Introduction

The CCD detector in the Red Channel Spectrograph will be replaced with a deep depletion CCD in the fall of 2006. This page summarizes the motivation behind the upgrade and provides some preliminary characteristics for the possible replacement devices. The information posted here may be used by astronomers proposing to use Red Channel in the first trimester (Jan - April) of 2007. However, please see the NOTE above. Eventually this page will also include on-sky calibration data and performance characteristics.


Motivation for the Upgrade

The optics and coatings for the MMT spectrographs have been optimized for the channel in which they are used: Blue or Red. However, in recent years, both of the channels have utilized thinned, backside illuminated CCDs and therefore, from a detector standpoint, much of the Blue/Red distinction has disappeared. In order to reestablish that distinction, the Red Channel spectrograph will be upgraded to use a new Lawrence Berkeley Labs deep depletion CCD.

Deep depletion devices differ from typical CCDs because they use thick, high-resistivity silicon which has a much higher opacity to red photons. They require high bias voltages of as much as 90 volts in order to reduce diffusion of charge into adjacent pixels.

The result will be quantum efficiency values that are more than double that of the current Red Channel CCD beyond 9000 angstroms. In addition, fringing longward of 8000 A has been a major problem with the current device. Because the silicon is as much as 300 microns thick in the deep depletion devices there will be no fringing in the upgraded Red Channel. This upgrade will also include the use of an SDSU gen2 controller which has already been purchased through the generous support of the Packard Foundation (X. Fan).

Because the devices are thick, they suffer from a higher rate of cosmic ray depositions than thinned devices. This will likely limit the maximum integration time for the upgraded system. Charge localization is also reduced, resulting in a slightly larger PSF. However, the Red Channel resolution should not be affected significantly in typical seeing conditions because of the oversampling inherent in the optical design. Finally, the read noise of the devices is larger than the current device; 10 electrons versus 3 electrons.


Advantages and Disadvantages


Advantages Disadvantages

Quantum Efficiency Comparison

Click here for a pdf plot of QEs.


Current CCD: ITL/STA CCD Characteristics

Click here for detector information.

Deep Depletion Detector Characteristics

Of several devices tested at ITL, two were deemed useful for scientific applications. The format of the devices is 1112 x 1012 with a pixel size is 18 microns. The table below illustrates the preliminary performance for the devices through both amplifiers.


Device sn5864 Device sn5867
UL Amplifier UR Amplifier UL Amplifier UR Amplifier
Gain 0.94 e/DN 1.04 e/DN 1.20 e/DN 1.30 e/DN
Read Noise ~10 e ~10 e ~10 e ~10 e
Dark Current 93.5 e/pix/hr - 9.36 e/pix/hr -

Notes:


Cosmic Rays

The image below shows the effect of cosmic rays in an hour long dark exposure.


Acknowledgements

The MMTO would like to acknowledge the hard work of Mike Lesser, Roy Tucker, and the ITL staff in evaluating and preparing the devices, controllers, and dewar for this project.

The SDSU gen2 controller for this project was purchased by X. Fan through the generous support of the Packard Foundation.


Questions or Concerns?

Users who have additional questions or concerns should contact Grant Williams (ggwilli at mmto.org) or Tim Pickering (tim at mmto.org). Xiaohui Fan (fan at as.arizona.edu) and Arjun Dey (NOAO) can answer questions about their experience with the MARS spectrograph on NOAO 4-meter which uses a similar device.



T. E. Pickering

Last modified: Wednesday, 25-Oct-2006 09:01:22 MST